The
voting paradox (also known as
Condorcet's paradox or the
paradox of voting) is a situation noted by the
Marquis de Condorcet in the late 18th century, in which collective preferences can be cyclic (i.e. not
transitive), even if the preferences of individual voters are not. This is
paradoxical,
because it means that majority wishes can be in conflict with each
other. When this occurs, it is because the conflicting majorities are
each made up of different groups of individuals.
For example, suppose we have three candidates, A, B, and C, and that
there are three voters with preferences as follows (candidates being
listed in decreasing order of preference):
Voter |
First preference |
Second preference |
Third preference |
Voter 1 |
A |
B |
C |
Voter 2 |
B |
C |
A |
Voter 3 |
C |
A |
B |
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário